1970 dodge charger rt hemi

images 1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Dodge Charger Rt Hemi. 1970 DODGE CHARGER R 1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Dodge Charger was in
  • 1970 Dodge Charger was in



  • BlueSunD
    02-27 12:12 AM
    Well this is what I�ve got so far, still a lot of things missing or to be fixed :)

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v55/BlueSunD/Maya/NeWmetro02.jpg

    Sorry if it looks kind of blurry, but it�s just a preview render :) I would love to see how every body else is doing........... well, great I guess, but I�m just so curious! :D





    wallpaper 1970 Dodge Charger was in 1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 dodge charger rt hemi.
  • 1970 dodge charger rt hemi.



  • uma_vishi
    07-14 11:03 PM
    Hi All,

    here is my situation.I'm working in USA on L1B visa which is about to complete 5 years in sep 2010.my company A (employer and client )want to apply for L1A. Also another company B is filing H1B. now to make my stay here without going to india for the time being is this possible.

    1) can both the companies apply for two different visa for a single person.
    2) what are the pros and cons.
    3) for conversion of L1B to L1A , is petition enough to stay in USA or do i need to go get the stamping.

    also H1b start time is OCt and my petition expires in sep 2009 but i'm having I-94 till Nov 2011.
    now how to manage one month time without going out of this country.
    can anybody please help me with this.

    Thanks in Advance.





    1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Dodge Charger Rt Hemi
  • 1970 Dodge Charger Rt Hemi



  • Ramba
    07-14 06:11 PM
    Guys. Stop threating the original poster. One can verywell change the employer before 180 days of 485 pending and enjoy the AC21 poring benefit. The only rule is "485 has be remain pending for 180 days" for AC21 benefit. One can change job anytime, even before 180 days. The only time it is invalid is, if a guy leavs the employer iwithin 6 months of 485 pending and 485is approved within 180 days of filing, then the GC is invalid one.





    2011 1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 dodge charger rt hemi.
  • 1970 dodge charger rt hemi.



  • kk_kk
    06-10 04:53 PM
    Sent



    more...


    1970 dodge charger rt hemi. SEMA 2010: Dodge Charger
  • SEMA 2010: Dodge Charger



  • vin13
    11-11 04:12 PM
    Pappu has already informed that with the limited resources they are not currently considering to actively persue regarding Quarterly Spillover.

    So for now, we need to do what we can by ourselves.





    1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Dodge Charger R-T 426
  • 1970 Dodge Charger R-T 426



  • dummgelauft
    03-12 10:10 AM
    To all those who are screaming and shouting about "IV collecting Donations and doing nothing", I am not a donor myself, but we have to understand that IV IS THE ONLY platform we (EB community) have. However shaky or small the platform is. It takes a different kind of person to doggedly keep at something as insipid and difficult and immigration relief for EB and to put up with all the brickbats that armchair immigration proponents and to be beneficiaries like us throw at the IV core.

    Pappu, I have put forth this idea many times, and will do so again, let IV be a members only forum, with a REASONABLE annual subscrition amount (say equal to themonthly cost of a decent cable/satellite subscription:-)..

    This will achieve the following:
    (1) Assured, stable fund collection for IV activities
    (2) Only genuine IV supporters will sign up.
    (3) To some extent, may be, will keep antis away (this is not assured, but may happen)

    ...Its Friday, so pickup a 6-pack, 12 pack or whatever pack on your way home, and relax...



    more...


    1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Dodge Charger Rt Hemi.
  • 1970 Dodge Charger Rt Hemi.



  • senthil1
    04-04 11:43 AM
    It is true. But either Corporate America or Lawyers does not want to address the issues raised by Unions or anti immigrants. They want free ride and does not care about working class. No bold leadership in congress to address both sides issues. Congress members are siding with any one of two groups. Everyone knows that compromise will easily pass. But compromise will not give free ride to any group. Basically moderate H1b and GC increase with protection to US workers without wage pressurw will get most of the congress support. Even with illegal immigration also it is easy to pass if they give citizenship to existing people and allow more workers with complete protection to US workers without wage pressure will get most of congress support.

    I think it is true coporate america will not allow it to go through, but it is also true that any bill faverable to the H1B and or GC will also have the same death
    as this one , do not underestimate the anti - immigration and unions clout
    on democrats, if corporate america wants H1B increase it will come at a price,
    more no free rides for corporate america as well.

    that is the reason why we see stalemate for any kind of immigration bill, neither side is able to push anything.

    thanks





    2010 1970 Dodge Charger Rt Hemi 1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Dodge Charger Rt Hemi. 1970 DODGE CHARGER R
  • 1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Dodge Charger Rt Hemi. 1970 DODGE CHARGER R



  • kanaihya
    09-26 10:03 AM
    Just Sent an email to the CNN editor ..to educate himslef/ his staff regarding the rally.
    thanks



    more...


    1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Dodge Charger R/T Hemi
  • 1970 Dodge Charger R/T Hemi



  • andycool
    07-12 04:56 PM
    E. APPLICABILITY OF INA SECTION 202(a)(5)(A)AS IT RELATES TO THE ALLOCATION OF �OTHERWISE UNUSED� NUMBERS

    INA Section 202(a)(5)(A), added by the American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act (AC21), provides that if total demand will be insufficient to use all available numbers in a particular Employment preference category in a calendar quarter, then the otherwise unused numbers may be made available without regard to the annual per-country limits. This provision helps to assure that all available Employment preference numbers may be used. In recent years, the application of Section 202(a)(5)(A) has occasionally allowed oversubscribed countries such as China-mainland born and India to utilize large quantities of Employment First and Second preference numbers that would have otherwise gone unused.

    For example, let us assume that 11,600 Employment Second preference numbers are available in a calendar quarter. There is heavy Employment Second preference demand by China-mainland born and India applicants; however, each country is oversubscribed and would ordinarily be limited to about 800 of the available numbers due to the prorating provisions of INA Section 202(e). Applicants from other countries that have not yet reached their per-country limit have reported a total demand of 6,500 numbers. After taking the worldwide demand into account, it is determined that as a result of the China-mainland born and India per-country limits only 8,100 of the total available Employment Second preference numbers would be used in that quarter. In this instance, the otherwise unused 3,500 numbers could then be made available to China-mainland born and India regardless of their per-country limits. Should that occur, the same cut-off date would be applied to each country, since numbers must be provided strictly in priority date order regardless of chargeability. In this instance, greater number use by one country would indicate a higher rate of demand by applicants from that country with earlier priority dates.

    According to this there should be a quarterly spillover ...:confused: but it looks like spillover is happening only in last quarter :D





    hair 1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 dodge charger rt hemi. My 1970 Dodge Charger R/T Hemi
  • My 1970 Dodge Charger R/T Hemi



  • godspeed
    06-11 09:40 AM
    and forwarded to 20 of my friends, will follow up with them to send the message



    more...


    1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1971 Dodge Charger R/T Hemi
  • 1971 Dodge Charger R/T Hemi



  • vghc
    07-03 11:59 AM
    If you call it re-distribution of pain, I would call it sharing the pain. I think its high time ROW candidates felt the pain which we non-ROW have suffered for a long time. You are objecting just because you are on the better side and wish to continue with the better bargain. If you think about it as a EB group in general, then its absolutely ridiculous that there should be country limits for EB category GC when there is no limits on H1B which is the primary route for most EB category GC applications. I completely agree with you on the family quotient of your arguement, they should not get the GC numbers which is meant only for primary EB applicant. Not that I want families to suffer, but the family GC numbers for EB applicants should not count towards GC number cap.

    Don't be ignorant, i am still bloody waiting for mine and counting!!!! :mad:
    Problem is not country quota, its the ones with families!!! ><





    hot SEMA 2010: Dodge Charger 1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 dodge charger rt hemi.
  • 1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 dodge charger rt hemi.



  • engineer
    09-27 09:15 AM
    http://www.mercopress.com/vernoticia.do?id=11377&formato=pdf



    more...


    house 1970 Dodge Charger Rt Hemi. 1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Dodge Charger R/T Hemi
  • 1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Dodge Charger R/T Hemi



  • vin13
    11-11 12:14 PM
    We can all send a copy to the ombudsmand and DOS.

    I will be discussing this with my congressperson in a couple of weeks. Can any of you contact your congressperson and have them help you regarding quarterly spillover? Use the draft to take to your local congressman.


    The draft letter looks good. I think, we should also send a copy or new letter to the Ombudsman and to the DOS (as DOS is also involved in how many visas are released).

    That way we do not get pushed around.

    Good work.

    Gaurav





    tattoo 1970 Dodge Charger R-T 426 1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Dodge Charger Rt Hemi.
  • 1970 Dodge Charger Rt Hemi.



  • ksvreg
    04-09 11:32 AM
    That is the reason I mentioned before that we have to give heads up to employer's HR department about these scenarios and let them come up with correct wording for POEs questions. This could be new virus breakout and we need to find a cure or prevent it someway tactically until the strategy in place. Not sure I make much sense here. In a nutshell, we need to contact our HR and request them to anwer (HR has to answer like this: It is possible to hire citizen but can not be done immediately. Its a process and takes a while to do that and no guarantee that citizen can be found. Until that time business will be impacted badly.) POE officer in case if there are any such questions. Generic answer from HR misleads and misued at POE.



    more...


    pictures 1970 Dodge Charger Rt Hemi. 1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Dodge Charger Rt Hemi.
  • 1970 Dodge Charger Rt Hemi.



  • pappu
    07-05 03:45 PM
    Update: Thank you everyone who has contributed since July 2 when we announced the drive. Our total contributions from paypal and google are around $2,500 till now (despite having 15 k members). As you can understand this is hardly of any significance for even a small legal effort. A big lawsuit is out of question. Thus IV core will use it for IV activities to further pursue its advocacy efforts. IV encourages its members being a plaintiffs with AILF if they so desire. If you are an IV member and also a plaintiff, you can let us know for any guidance we can provide. IV will be coming up with more direction to its members soon. We will have some plan for everyone and will need participation from everyone. Please stay tuned.





    dresses 1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Dodge Hemi Challenger RT
  • 1970 Dodge Hemi Challenger RT



  • Hermione
    09-26 10:55 AM
    FSB debate is on H1-B raise and NOT on PR visas. So, I dont see reason to participation in debate. Thanks for the info though.

    Actually, I think participating in the debate to present the other point of view (as in 'foreign workers are good for the US economy') is a good thing to do. Giving the forum out to the antis is a good way to make sure Durbin gets his message reaffirmed. Well, that's all true, unless you are one of those people who likes to yell 'Close the door!' right after they get in.



    more...


    makeup 1970 Dodge Charger R/T Hemi 1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Dodge Charger Rt Hemi.
  • 1970 Dodge Charger Rt Hemi.



  • pd052009
    03-22 06:29 AM
    ^^^^





    girlfriend 1970 Dodge Charger Rt Hemi. 1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 dodge charger rt hemi.
  • 1970 dodge charger rt hemi.



  • jonty_11
    12-13 10:13 AM
    Count me and 2 more members with me....lets have a plan..and execute it.





    hairstyles 1971 Dodge Charger R/T Hemi 1970 dodge charger rt hemi. 1970 Dodge Challenger Rt Hemi
  • 1970 Dodge Challenger Rt Hemi



  • SunnySurya
    07-14 08:51 PM
    Thakur to gayo... (A Dialogue from hindi movie Karan Arjun)
    but the good news is , since your I-140 was approved, your PD is locked and you may be able to use AC21
    I filed for 485 during July 2007. My 140 was already approved. Due to some problems I quit my employer in August 2007. My previous employer was a desi blood sucker. I was fed up & decided to quit after working for him for 3 years. I applied for H1 transfer with a new employer based on approved 140. I got H1 approval for another 3 years. Currently I am working for the new H1 sponsoring employer. I also received an EAD card based on pending 485 for one year. I didnt notify USICS of job change in July.

    I applied for EAD extension this year. The application for EAD extension is pending. I got a following RFE on my 485:
    Please state whether or not you are currently working for your I-140 petitioner.
    You must submit a currently dated letter from you permanent employer, describing your present job duties & position in the organization, your proferred position (if different from your current one), the date you began employement & the offered salary & wage. The letter must also indicate whether the terms & conditions of your employement based visa petition (or labor certification) continue to exist.

    I am not in good terms with my previous employer so I cant ask him for a letter. I can ask my new employer for such a letter.
    Will USCIS come to know I quite Employer A before completing 180 days?
    Also is it possible that 140 was revoked by my previous employer?
    What document should I send to USCIS now?





    Legal
    07-04 09:10 PM
    [QUOTE=nixstor]Excellent analysis but it does have flaws

    I am sure you might have read this from murthy's website (http://www.murthy.com/news/n_dosebn.html) or not, but DOS/CA/VO officials shared this piece with them. As per the above article, final quarter quota should not open until Jul 2nd. I understand that agencies can implement and interpret certain stuff, but you cannot interpret and implement one thing on Jun 13th and another on Jul 2nd. If its written into law, that the quarterly allocation is a must, USCIS is in violation and DOS/CA/VO as well for not policing them of visa number usage.


    "Essentially, the numbers are spread out during the first three quarters and whatever is left is available during the last quarter"

    On reading the Murthy article it appears that the biggest mistake USCIS committed was using up the visa numbers before the 4th qtr began on 7/2/07.

    USCIS did it other way around...desparately rushed to use up the numbers before the 4th qtr began....only explanation is to avoid doing additional paperwork for the July filers...





    rajuram
    01-25 01:26 AM
    For my part, I send an email everyday to the white house and the state dept. This is probably not enough.....but may be some day it will work.

    BTW, my apologies if the members thought that this thread was accusatory. Still the question remains, what next?

    Ok, I understand, no use bringing it up again, sorry, let me go back and read other interesting threads on "investments" and "buying houses"...

    How about we start writing letters to the WhiteHouse/President on

    (i) Eliminate per country quota limits
    (ii) Recapture the lost visas
    (iii) Porcessing dates cannot go back

    for administrative fixes ?



    No comments:

    Post a Comment